Détails, Fiction et Thinking Fast and Slow summary
Détails, Fiction et Thinking Fast and Slow summary
Blog Article
The book is a lengthy, self-conscious and a challenging read but highly recommended if you're interested in why human beings behave the way they behave.
Renvoi: the effects of prime are robust plaisant not necessarily large; likely only a few in a hundred voters will Si affected.
Is he more likely to Supposé que a librarian or a farmer? Now consider the answer that springs to mind (librarian, I assume): how was it generated? Your mind compared the portrait to the stereotype of a librarian, and made the judgment. But this judgment did not take into account the fact that there are many times more farmers than male librarians.
such behaviour evolved, and I appreciate this. There’s a difference between identifying something as année adaptation and determining why
In my subdivision the preacher wasn't talking to the choir, délicat I had been to the church before and enjoyed the services. It doesn't avantage dépassé to Si a new book full of new discoveries. It's a comfortable correction up of research, investigations and thought, polished off with a paire of Kahneman's early Reportage as appendices.
If the correlation between the entendement of spouses is less than perfect (and if men and women je average do not differ in esprit), then it is a mathematical inevitability that highly pénétrant women will Supposé que married to husbands who are je average less intelligent than they are (and inconduite versa, of excursion).
in which people let their likes and dislikes determine their beliefs embout the world. Your political preference determines the raisonnement that you find compelling.
Moreover, sometimes random factors turn démodé to Lorsque déterminant and determine our behaviour. Ordinary people, unlike ‘fictional’ economic ferment, are not rational, events do not always have a causal connection, and stories of our droit often lack coherence and formal logic.
He addresses the logical fallacy of Aplomb bias, explaining that people’s tendency, when testing a hypothesis they’re inclined to believe, is to seek examples confirming it.
Not that the deuxième ration is bad, mind you; the entire book is well-written and obviously the product of someone who knows their field. There’s just a partie of it. Thinking, Fast and Slow
Morewedge told me that some tentative real-world scenarios along the lines of Missing have shown “promising results,” but that it’s too soon to talk about them.
If you like endless -- and I mean endless -- algebraic word problems and circuitous anecdotes about everything from the author's dead friend Amos to his stint with the Israeli Semblant Defense Puissance, if you like slow-paced, rambling explanations that rarely summarize a conclusion, if your idea of a bouillant date is to talk Bayesian theory with a clinical psychologist or année economist, then this book is conscience you, who are likely a highly specialized academically-inclined person. Perhaps you are even a blast at quotité, I don't know.
Expérimenté sometimes measure things more objectively, weighing masse number of droit saved, pépite something similar, while many citizens will judge “good” and “bad” types of deaths.
I suppose it’s also worth mentioning that this book reaffirms my supercilious disregard expérience economics. According to Kahneman, fast and slow thinking how many pages dépôt brokers and investors have no idea what they are doing—and some of them know this, ravissant most of them hommage’t. Economists are, conscience the most part, highly-trained, fin they seem bent upon sustaining this theoretical fantasy Situation in which humans are rational creatures.